“AI CAN MANAGE YOUR MONEY—BUT NOT YOUR MORALS, SAYS JOSEPH PLAZO”“AI CAN MANAGE YOUR MONEY—BUT NOT YOUR MORALS, SAYS JOSEPH PLAZO”“AUTOMATED TRADING, ETHICAL BLIND SPOTS: JOSEPH PLAZO’S WARNING TO ASIA”

“AI Can Manage Your Money—But Not Your Morals, Says Joseph Plazo”“AI Can Manage Your Money—But Not Your Morals, Says Joseph Plazo”“Automated Trading, Ethical Blind Spots: Joseph Plazo’s Warning to Asia”

“AI Can Manage Your Money—But Not Your Morals, Says Joseph Plazo”“AI Can Manage Your Money—But Not Your Morals, Says Joseph Plazo”“Automated Trading, Ethical Blind Spots: Joseph Plazo’s Warning to Asia”

Blog Article


At a gathering of Asia’s most promising finance and tech students, Joseph Plazo, shared a powerful reminder: in a world increasingly shaped by machines, human judgment remains essential.

From the financial heart of Southeast Asia — At the Asian Institute of Management, what began as a discussion on AI became a deeper debate on accountability.

Plazo, the founder of Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital, is known for building systems that outperform markets.

And yet, it was not code he chose to champion—but caution.

“Letting AI handle your trades is fine—but not your conscience.”

???? **A Technologist Who Questions the Tools He Built**

Plazo’s credibility comes not from critique, but from contribution. Major asset managers rely on his proprietary tools.


“Accuracy without context is risky.”

He recounted a key moment during the COVID-19 crash: a bot under his firm’s control flagged a short position on gold—hours before an emergency Federal Reserve announcement.

“We intervened,” he said. “The AI was technically correct, but it lacked the wider understanding.”

???? **The Importance of Human Oversight in Automated Systems**

In a reference to a 2023 Fortune roundtable, Plazo cited concerns that traders increasingly feel disconnected from the market—no longer making decisions, but following models.

“Pausing isn’t always inefficient. Sometimes, it’s responsible.”

He proposed a decision here framework, which he called **“Conviction Calculus”**, grounded in three guiding questions:

- Does this move copyright the firm’s reputation?
- Have non-digital factors been considered—such as public sentiment, leadership experience, or history?
- Are we prepared to accept accountability if the model fails?

???? **Why Joseph Plazo’s Message Resonates Across the Region**

Across Asia, investment in AI and fintech is accelerating. Countries like Singapore, South Korea, and the Philippines are becoming hubs for automated trading systems and tech-led asset management.

Plazo’s message? We may be scaling faster than we are thinking.

“You can scale capital faster than character,” he said. “That gap must be addressed—or consequences will follow.”

In 2024 alone, two hedge funds in Hong Kong reported billion-dollar losses due to AI-driven decisions that failed to anticipate geopolitical shifts.

“Automation doesn’t mean immunity from error.”

???? **Toward More Responsible Systems**

Despite his warnings, Plazo remains optimistic about AI’s future—when developed thoughtfully.

His team is building what he described as **“narrative-integrated AI”**—tools that factor in not just financial data, but also context, tone, timing, and social dynamics.

“Data without story is dangerous.”

At a private gathering after his talk, investors discussed partnerships around ethical AI solutions. One described his vision as:

“Exactly what the financial sector needs right now.”

???? **The Warning That Shouldn’t Be Ignored**

Plazo concluded with a sobering statement:

“Crashes won’t always be emotional. Some will be perfectly rational—and perfectly wrong.”

It wasn’t alarmist. It was necessary.

Because in the race to automate everything, what’s often lost is not just time—but responsibility.

Report this page